W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > April 2009

Constrained implementation of exclusive C14N -- waht breaks?

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:02:40 +0200
Message-Id: <5782B31D-F9B8-4207-8C90-48603C571083@w3.org>
To: Konrad Lanz <konrad.lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>
Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
To pick up on the question that Scott asked today, what are the  
concrete examples of things that break if the constrained  
implementation of exclusive C14N is used (not just as an optimization,  
but as the *only* canonicalization available)?

Since you seemed to have some ideas on the call, are there concrete  
examples that you can give?


Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Come to the W3C track unconferences at WWW 2009!
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 16:02:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:11 UTC