W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Elliptic Curve issue status

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:38:33 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3E78C814-1AA6-4CED-AE4C-5880A4CC6D72@nokia.com>
To: ext Magnus Nyström <magnus@rsa.com>
Magnus

Are you able to confirm that the editorial actions for ISSUE-92 and  
ISSUE-103 are complete? Do you have pointers to where the draft has  
been updated?

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:32 AM, ext Magnus Nyström wrote:

> Frederick,
>
> #92 and #93 are done and can be closed.
> We had agreement on #103 and AFAICT the text has been included now in
> XMLEnc 1.1 so this one should also be possible to close.
>
> -- Magnus
>
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
>
>> We have a few  open issues related to elliptic curve. Please review  
>> and
>> indicate if any can be closed, or what actions might be needed to  
>> close them.
>>
>> ISSUE-92
>> Include the \"implicitCA\" option for ECKeyValueType and separate
>> ECDomainParameterType type
>> Action needed?, volunteer for action?
>>
>> ISSUE-93
>> Missing a <Hash> element in the ds:ECParametersType type definition
>> done with ECValidationDataType change. Propose to close.
>>
>> ISSUE-103
>> Shouldn't there be a REQUIRED curve in XMLENC as well as there is  
>> one in
>> XMLDSIG
>> Proposal needed? Volunteer for action?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> regards, Frederick
>>
>> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
>> Chair XML Security WG
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 13:39:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:58 GMT