- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:40:24 +0200
- To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
On 2008-05-06 16:07:29 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > ./dname/diffRFCs-1-IAIK.xml:2: element KeyInfo: Relax-NG validity error : Expecting element Object, got KeyInfo > ./dname/diffRFCs-1-IAIK.xml:2: element Object: Relax-NG validity error : Expecting an element got text > ./dname/diffRFCs-1-IAIK.xml:2: element Object: Relax-NG validity error : Element Object has extra content: text > ./dname/diffRFCs-1-IAIK.xml:2: element KeyInfo: Relax-NG validity error : Element Signature has extra content: KeyInfo > ./dname/diffRFCs-1-IAIK.xml fails to validate Looking at these in more detail, it looks like the test case files in question should be valid. They do validate against the xsd, and against the "old" RNG schema. There are therefore at least two problems with the proposed RNG schema: - Object can have mixed content - the optional KeyInfo doesn't seem to actually work. I don't quite know why. Help appreciated, as I'm neither a schema nor an RNG guru. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 13:41:01 UTC