I think we should remove it but I'd like to hear from Konrad who I think created it. I'm not sure I understand the rationale behind the test. It says "Check that implementations of [XML-C14N1.1] correctly verify incorrect legacy signatures still using [XML-C14N] for the default node set to octet stream conversion method." But in this case, there is no explicit C14N 1.1 transform, so a C14N 1.1 implementation would not get triggered. --Sean Frederick Hirsch wrote: > > Do we wish to keep defCon-legacy-1 listed in the test cases document [1] > if it was not part of interop? > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html#xmldsigdefCan-legacy-1 > > >Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:29:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:29:46 GMT