W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > September 2007

Re: should action 65 be closed?

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 18:29:33 +0200
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Cc: Cruellas Juan Carlos <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>, XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20070904162933.GY19018@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

I remember this one as supposedly closed, from today's call.

I'm wondering a bit whether I closed one of the continued actions
instead, though.  Frederick, can you double-check whether I closed
anything that should have remained open?

Thanks,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 2007-09-04 12:11:17 -0400, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
> To: Cruellas Juan Carlos <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>
> Cc: Hirsch Frederick <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>,
> 	XMLSec <public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org>
> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:11:17 -0400
> Subject: should action 65 be closed?
> List-Id: <public-xmlsec-maintwg.w3.org>
> X-Spam-Level: 
> X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/4DDD6A78-D9DA-4FF4-82E3-8286FC86AC38@nokia.com
> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5
> 
>
> I thought we closed action 65 on today's call, but this is not clear from 
> the minutes. Should this one stay open or be closed?
>
> OPEN] ACTION-65: Juan Carlos Cruellas to develop/retrieve test cases for 
> C14N with comments, scheme-based xpointers - due 2007-07-24
>
> New content in latest draft for Scheme Based XPointers
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Aug/0004.html
>
> Keep open - additional information: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Jul/0054.html
>
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 16:29:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:02 GMT