W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal

From: Richard Salz <rsalz@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 23:47:19 -0500
To: "Ed Simon" <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
Cc: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org, public-xmlsec-maintwg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDEC21CD2.6384C6EC-ON8525738D.00199E08-8525738D.001A3926@us.ibm.com>


I think the canonicalization thoughts on pages 13ff are a horrible idea. 
It would require every entity verifying a signature to understand the 
semantics of every namespace it might see getting signed.
        /r$
--
STSM, DataPower Chief Programmer
WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
http://www.ibm.com/software/integration/datapower/

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 04:47:37 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ed Simon: "RE: XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal"
Previous message: Ed Simon: "RE: XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal"
In reply to: Ed Simon: "XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal"
Next in thread: Ed Simon: "RE: XML Signature 2.0 Strawman Proposal"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:03 GMT