Re: Additional issue on RFC 2253 usage in relation with XMLSig: On the capability of the RFC2253 "CN=Sam"encoding form for identifying a Certificate. from Thomas Roessler on 2007-06-26 (public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org from June 2007)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 05:36:52 -0700
To: Juan Carlos Cruellas <cruellas@ac.upc.edu>
Cc: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070626123652.GC3529@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-06-26 10:42:20 +0200, Juan Carlos Cruellas wrote:

> Certainly the charter says that the group may develop a best
> practices w3c note... do you think that we should at least
> discuss the feasibility of producing it?

I think we're increasingly getting into discussions that most
usefully would feed into such a note.

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 12:36:55 UTC