> I can live with it if we can't fix the existing text. But I wouldn't be > happy changing our implementation to follow these encoding rules, simply > because I believe the first rule makes the resulting DN non 2253 > compliant. I would really like to find out why in particular the first > rule was imposed: > > Escape any trailing white space by replacing "\ " with "\20" > RFC2253 section 2.4 second bullet of the list of cases where escaping is mandated, reads: "a space character occuring at the end of the string". do they not mean the same? and if not, is it on purpose or just that the first sentence did not capture the esence of the second? Juan CarlosReceived on Thursday, 7 June 2007 14:35:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT