W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: updated editor's draft

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:19:42 -0400
Message-Id: <39D8D1BE-DE0C-415B-A737-0860D5AC9C41@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
To: ext Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>

> I think the C14N 1.1 algs also should be listed in Section 6.1.

Agreed.

Should change

Canonicalization
1. Required Canonical XML (omits comments)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
2. Recommended Canonical XML with Comments
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#WithComments

to

Canonicalization
1. Required Canonical XML 1.0 (omits comments)
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315
2. Recommended Canonical XML 1.0 with Comments
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#WithComments

3. Required Canonical XML 1.1 (omits comments)
http://@@

4. Recommended Canonical XML 1.1 (with Comments)
http://@@

---
Added 1.0 to #1 and #2 and add #3 and #4. URIs TBD.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Jul 30, 2007, at 3:12 PM, ext Sean Mullan wrote:

>
> I think the C14N 1.1 algs also should be listed in Section 6.1.
>
> I forgot if we discussed this in a past meeting, but weren't we  
> also going to add the Exclusive C14N algorithms to section 6.1/6.5  
> (Canonicalization Algorithms)?
>
> --Sean
>
> Thomas Roessler wrote:
>> I've made changes corresponding to Paul's proposals in the latest
>> iteration of the editor's draft:
>>   XML-Signature Syntax and Processing
>>   Editor's Draft $Date: 2007/07/26 16:06:49 $
>>   http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/
>> Specifically:
>> - added "Support of the xpointer() scheme [XPointer-xpointer]  
>> beyond the
>>   minimal usage discussed in this section is discouraged." to the
>>   insert in section 4.3.3.2, where the behavior of the xpointer()
>>   idioms we need is defined
>> - Replaced the duplicate definition of these XPointers in section
>>   4.3.3.3 by a reference to 4.3.3.2
>> - Moved the definition of same-document URI references in 4.3.3.2
>>   out of a parenthesis into a separate paragraph.
>> While writing this, it occurs to me that the reference to the
>> xpointer() Working Draft that I meant to insert is still missing.
>> Doing that in a moment.
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 21:20:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT