On 2007-07-12 23:05:35 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > Thinking out loud here, we should be able to *define* the behavior > of #xpointer(id('ID')) and #xpointer(/) in terms of of element() > XPointers, without any resulting in any change in actual > conformance. Well, it's not really possible for element() to identify the root node, but other than that, the plan seems to work (after reviewing a bunch of relevant spec material). http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core/xmldsig-core-xpointer.html ... is a variant of the editor's draft that I *think* has the necessary changes to sections 4.3.3.2 and 4.3.3.3. It's a first stab, though. Please review. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>Received on Thursday, 12 July 2007 22:38:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:00 GMT