- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:50:42 +0200
- To: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- Cc: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
On 2007-07-09 21:20:32 -0400, Ed Simon wrote: > In reviewing the current draft of XML Signature, I am delighted to see the > text approach what I had suggested back in May [1] ;-) So am I. :) > >>> > * The X509IssuerSerial element, which contains an X.509 issuer > distinguished name/serial number pair. The distinguished name SHOULD be > represented as a string that complies with section 3 of RFC4514 [ > <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/#ref-LDAP-DN> LDAP-DN], > > * The X509SubjectName element, which contains an X.509 subject > distinguished name that SHOULD be represented as a string that complies with > section 3 of RFC4514 [ <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/#ref-LDAP-DN> > LDAP-DN], > <<< > to > >>> > * The X509IssuerSerial element, which contains an X.509 issuer > distinguished name/serial number pair. The distinguished name SHOULD be > represented as a string that complies with <new>the rules specified in > section "Distinguished Name Encoding"</new>, > > * The X509SubjectName element, which contains an X.509 subject > distinguished name that SHOULD be represented as a string that complies with > <new>the rules specified in section "Distinguished Name Encoding"</new> > <<< > > Do others agree with the above suggested changes to 4.4.4? Sounds useful to me. Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2007 08:50:49 UTC