On Dec 11, 2007, at 5:16 PM, ext Grosso, Paul wrote: > > [Resending with corrected subject line.] > > Thomas et al., > > At > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization- > comments/20 > 07Oct/0000 > you sent a comment to the C14N 1.1 comment list that > included the following issue: > > Appendix A was found to be complex to the point of being > unimplementable. > > > We have replaced the algorithm in Appendix A with a list > of examples and have done some rewording in the prose of > section 3.2 (as suggested by the XML Security Specifications > Maintenance WG) to explain the algorithm. > > For the purposes of the Disposition of Comments, do you accept > this resolution of your comment? > > Please reply to the www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org > as soon as feasible so that we can complete our DoC. > > thanks, > > paul > > Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG > yes regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch, Nokia Chair XML Security Specifications Maintenance WGReceived on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 13:27:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:03 GMT