W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: deprecating xpointer

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:58:27 +0200
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Cc: konrad.lanz@iaik.tugraz.at, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070813135827.GI14409@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>

On 2007-08-07 13:22:18 -0400, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> I think we should go with the second option in #1, so that the
> reader is at least aware of the situation.

Actually, +1 to that, in particular in the light of [1].

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2007JulSep/0015.html

> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
>
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 10:05 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
>>
>> I think the two alternatives we are discussing are:
>>
>> 1. Keep the following phrase:
>>
>>> Support of the xpointer() scheme [XPointer-xpointer] beyond the
>>> minimal usage discussed in this section is discouraged.
>>
>> Possibly with a change as suggested during the call:
>>
>>> [XPointer-xpointer] is in Working Draft status as of publication
>>> of this edition of XML Signature.  Therefore, support of the
>>> xpointer() scheme beyond the minimal usage discussed in this
>>> section is discouraged.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 August 2007 13:58:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:01 GMT