W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: deprecating xpointer

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:22:18 -0400
Message-Id: <59CC0F45-D8DD-4648-86C2-DEB00E1D8E2F@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, konrad.lanz@iaik.tugraz.at, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>

I think we should go with the second option in #1, so that the reader  
is at least aware of the situation.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Aug 7, 2007, at 10:05 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:

>
> I think the two alternatives we are discussing are:
>
> 1. Keep the following phrase:
>
>> Support of the xpointer() scheme [XPointer-xpointer] beyond the
>> minimal usage discussed in this section is discouraged.
>
> Possibly with a change as suggested during the call:
>
>> [XPointer-xpointer] is in Working Draft status as of publication
>> of this edition of XML Signature.  Therefore, support of the
>> xpointer() scheme beyond the minimal usage discussed in this
>> section is discouraged.
>
> 2. Drop this section completely, since it is felt to unduly
> deprecate existing implementations.
>
> Regards,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
>
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 17:23:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:01 GMT