W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > August 2007

Re: talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:39:14 -0400
Message-Id: <125200DA-67A2-44A5-9049-465EFBF6681F@nokia.com>
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
To: ext Anthony Nadalin <drsecure@us.ibm.com>

Would it be possible for you to share a draft on the xmlsec mailing  
list?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia


On Aug 1, 2007, at 10:56 AM, ext Anthony Nadalin wrote:

> I think so as we tried to capture some of this in the WS-Security  
> specifications, maybe we can pull some of that info out
>
> Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122
>
> <graycol.gif>
> Thomas Roessler ---08/01/2007 09:52:22 AM---Tony,
>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> From:
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> To:
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Anthony Nadalin/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Cc:
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Date:
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> 08/01/2007 09:52 AM
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> Subject:
> <ecblank.gif>
>
> talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?
>
>
>
>
> Tony,
>
> following the conversation on yesterday's call, I wonder if it's
> worth discussing the circumstances in which inclusive and exclusive
> canonicalization are most useful in the Best Practices document.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 18:40:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:42 UTC