W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org > August 2007

talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:48:01 -0400
To: drsecure@us.ibm.com
Cc: public-xmlsec-maintwg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20070801144801.GC2974@raktajino.does-not-exist.org>


Tony,

following the conversation on yesterday's call, I wonder if it's
worth discussing the circumstances in which inclusive and exclusive
canonicalization are most useful in the Best Practices document.

Thoughts?

Cheers,
-- 
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>

Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 14:48:13 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anthony Nadalin: "Re: talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?"
Next in thread: Anthony Nadalin: "Re: talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?"
Reply: Anthony Nadalin: "Re: talk about exclusive c14n in best practices doc?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:01 GMT