Re: Hypermedia - Why

"...100 year old scotch..." /me perks up<g>.

mca
+1.859.757.1449
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me




On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:35 AM, David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com> wrote:

>
>
> > As to "why the xml namespace" aspect, I think it is important to hand
> > developers the tools for the
> > job.  Namespaces are not part of XML, and indeed not everyone wants to
> use
> > them, and I think the
> > goal of XML is to be successful on the internet, namespaces or not.
> > To do that, I believe a language needs to have elements which reflect the
> > environment of deployment.
>
> I suggest pragmatically taking this goal of the table for the simple fact
> that it is not going to happen.
> W3C "owns" the "xml:" prefix. (and namespace).   They have made it
> perfectly clear the scope of things they are willing to add,
> and that scope is prety much zero right now.
> This is not a fight we will win, regardless of merit.  I bet you a 100
> year old scotch on that.
>
> So I suggest, again pragmatically, that if this effort has *any* chance of
> adoption that it be implemented either with no namespace attributes or with
> a distinct non-xml: namespace or both    .
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> David Lee
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> dlee@marklogic.com
> Phone: +1 650-287-2531
> Cell:  +1 812-630-7622
> www.marklogic.com
>
> This e-mail and any accompanying attachments are confidential. The
> information is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
> addressed. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this
> e-mail communication by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please notify us immediately by returning this message
> to the sender and delete all copies. Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:39:11 UTC