- From: SJ Kissane <skissane@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:01:19 +1100
- To: public-xml-testsuite@w3.org
On 21 February 2014 18:51, SJ Kissane <skissane@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this should be TYPE="invalid" not TYPE="not-wf", since > "Notation Declared" is a validity constraint not a well-formedness > constraint, and therefore documents which violate it are invalid yet > still well-formed. I'm wrong: while "Notation Declared" is a VC, "Parsed Entity" is a WFC, and this XML is not well-formed since it violates that WFC. But still, this test is rather confused. It claims to be testing for violation of a VC in a not-wf test, but actually tests for a violation of a different WFC instead. Two possible fixes: 1) Amend SECTIONS to reference 4.1 [68] instead, update description accordingly 2) Change <doc>&e;</doc> to <doc></doc> to remove the WFC-violation, and change TYPE="not-wf" to TYPE="invalid" as I originally suggested Regards Simon
Received on Friday, 21 February 2014 13:01:46 UTC