Thank you! I will forward this response. Sandra At 04:18 PM 6/8/2004 +0100, Richard Tobin wrote: > > It looks like Graham is right. The intention of the test was to test > > invalid CDATA syntax and in not really doing that. CDATA is not even > > included a part o the content model description given in the > > specification. Can some address this issue? > >The test is: > > <!DOCTYPE doc [ > <!ELEMENT doc CDATA> > ]> > <doc></doc> > >This was allowed in SGML and declared that the element had CDATA content. >It is a syntax error in XML. > >Don't confuse it with > > <!ELEMENT doc (CDATA)> > >which would declare doc to contain an element called "CDATA". > >There is nothing wrong with the test, though the description doesn't >explain the motivation to people who don't remember SGML. > >-- Richard Sandra I. Martinez National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970, Gaithersburg, Md. 20899 (301) 975-3579 sandra.martinez@nist.govReceived on Tuesday, 8 June 2004 11:58:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:04 GMT