[Bug 27257] anyURI_b006 seems to be valid

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27257

--- Comment #5 from Georgiy Rakov <georgiy.rakov@oracle.com> ---
If I understand correctly the intention is to treat referencing rfc2396 within
[4] in 'loose binding' manner (is this correct?). But W3C spec [4] doesn't
state that referencing to rfc2396 is done in 'loose binding' way. BTW: rfc2396
doesn't have any references to rfc3986 but even if such reference existed, I
believe, it wouldn't be obvious that it should take 'superseding' effect when
applying to [4].

So as I see it there is no normative spec stating that rfc2396 should be
superseded by rfc3986 when applying to W3C spec [4]. I believe 'tight binding'
is the 'default understanding' (it's closer to literal interpretation of the
text). 

Neither are there any comments that rfc2396 should be understood with some
corrections taken into account (as Michael said rfc2396 is a mess).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 12:16:38 UTC