W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org > June 2010

Re: question about the README files

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:13:49 +0100
To: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
Cc: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bsk4npcfm.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen writes:

> Do these README files belong in the full distribution of the
> test suite, or is their presence there simply a mistake?

Mistake.

> If they belong, can someone explain what they mean?
>
> If they don't belong, should a fresh version of the 1.0
> test suite be prepared in which they (and possibly the CVS
> sub-directories present in some locations) are omitted?

Yes in principle.  In practice it's not going to be very high up my
list of priorities.

> Or does it not matter whether they belong or not?

Sure it matters, but not very much.  The clientelle for the test suite
is small and sophisticated, and unlikely to be confused by this in
practice.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFMGJXNkjnJixAXWBoRAmCcAJ99XLC3W/+QYyygzDgBV9I6Dv8p4wCZAdCr
bQxhZCSapmAUQdbJXiAC/NE=
=5MHK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2010 09:14:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 June 2010 09:14:25 GMT