- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:53:12 +0000
- To: public-xml-schema-testsuite@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4048
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2008-06-21 14:53:11 ---
Agreed that these are not legal instances of xs:anyURI under 1.0, though they
become legal in 1.1.
Noted however that there are significant problems in the 1.0 spec concerning
xs:anyURI:
* it references RFC 2396 rather than 3986
* it's not clear about the status of relative URI [references], fragment
identifiers, etc. (We clearly intend to allow them, but the RFC itself is so
vague in its terminology that it's unclear whether the rules as written do
allow them.)
Perhaps we should mark these particular tests as invalid, but add a note saying
the rules are fuzzy.
Decision: mark the expected result as "invalid".
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 21 June 2008 14:53:46 UTC