Re: XProc Minutes 5 Feb 2014

I assume that we're not changing the F2F agenda to add a review of the
requirements since we just did that.  ;)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes
>
> [1]W3C
>
>                                    - DRAFT -
>
>                             XML Processing Model WG
>
> 05 Feb 2014
>
>    [2]Agenda
>
>    See also: [3]IRC log
>
> Attendees
>
>    Present
>            Norm, Alex, Vojtech, Henry, Jim
>
>    Regrets
>
>    Chair
>            Norm
>
>    Scribe
>            Norm
>
> Contents
>
>      * [4]Topics
>
>          1. [5]Accept this agenda?
>          2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
>          3. [7]Next meeting: 19/20 Feb 2014 (face-to-face in Edinburgh).
>          4. [8]Review of open action items
>          5. [9]Publish XPP as a Working Group Note
>          6. [10]Face-to-face agenda
>          7. [11]Jim's SCXML review
>          8. [12]Progress on 1.0 bugs
>          9. [13]Any progress on step libraries
>         10. [14]Review of requirements document
>         11. [15]Any other business?
>
>      * [16]Summary of Action Items
>
>    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   Accept this agenda?
>
>    -> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-agenda
>
>    Accepted.
>
>   Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
>
>    -> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes
>
>    Accepted.
>
>   Next meeting: 19/20 Feb 2014 (face-to-face in Edinburgh).
>
>    Jim and Vojtech will attend remotely. Alex, Henry, Norm expected in
>    person.
>
>   Review of open action items
>
>   Publish XPP as a Working Group Note
>
>    -> [19]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
>
>    Norm: I propose to request publication of that document as a Working Group
>    Note, are there any objections?
>
>    None heard.
>
>   Face-to-face agenda
>
>    ->
>    [20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Feb/0010.html
>
>    Norm: Any comments or proposes for changes?
>
>    Alex: Shouldn't we start with a review of the existing requirements
>    document?
>
>    Norm: I'll add that to the agenda
>
>   Jim's SCXML review
>
>    Norm: Thank you, Jim, for doing that review.
>    ... I think the net-net is that there's some similarity but sufficient
>    differences that there's probably no value in attempting to coordinate
>    more closely.
>
>    Jim: The only overlap really is the executable content; they say a
>    processor may provide additional executable content. In theory you could
>    drop XProc in there.
>    ... There's some ambiguity in the spec wrt the context item; we could ask
>    them about that. They're also using XPath 1.0, but I don't see any reason
>    they couldn't upgrade.
>
>    Norm: Ok, but do you want the WG to do that?
>
>    Jim: I think we should send suggestions.
>
>    <scribe> ACTION: A-252-01 Jim to draft a proposed response to the SCXML
>    WG. [recorded in
>    [21]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
>
>   Progress on 1.0 bugs
>
>    None reported.
>
>   Any progress on step libraries
>
>    Jim: I'm pretty much ready to republish the steps.
>
>    Norm: Should we put that on the f2f agenda?
>
>    Jim: Yes
>
>    Norm: Ok.
>
>   Review of requirements document
>
>    -> [22]http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-v2-req/
>
>   Any other business?
>
>    Adjourned.
>
> Summary of Action Items
>
>    [NEW] ACTION: A-252-01 Jim to draft a proposed response to the SCXML WG.
>    [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
>
>    [End of minutes]
>
>    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [24]scribe.perl version 1.138 ([25]CVS
>     log)
>     $Date: 2014-02-05 15:42:12 $
>
> References
>
>    1. http://www.w3.org/
>    2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-agenda
>    3. http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-xproc-irc
>    4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#agenda
>    5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item01
>    6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item02
>    7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item03
>    8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item04
>    9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item05
>   10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item06
>   11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item07
>   12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item08
>   13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item09
>   14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item10
>   15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#item11
>   16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-minutes#ActionSummary
>   17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/02/05-agenda
>   18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2014/01/29-minutes
>   19. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
>   20. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2014Feb/0010.html
>   21. http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-xproc-minutes.html#action01
>   22. http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc-v2-req/
>   23. http://www.w3.org/2014/02/05-xproc-minutes.html#action01
>   24. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
>   25. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/



-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics

Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 16:07:33 UTC