W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: XML Processor Profiles / LC Comment Status

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:57:59 +0000
To: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Cc: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5b8v7qr9dk.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Alex Milowski writes:

> Henry: I think we're doing better than that. The external declarations
> profile gives you the infoset you want, whether or not its validated,
> and then you can decide independently to validate it.
> Norm: Perhaps a note to that effect in 2.3 would be a good idea.
> Henry: In section 3, for class Extended perhaps we should say
> explicitly that may be absent under 2.1 and 2.2.
>
> These comments not have an action item nor anything in the minutes
> saying we're not doing that.  I think we missed taking Norm & Henry's
> suggestion.  If we did that and the previous action items, I think
> we've addressed Michael's substantive comments in as much as we're
> going to do.

I think you missed this

  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2012Sep/0016.html

I think action "210-22" is a not-detected typo for 210-02

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 11:58:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 January 2013 11:58:24 GMT