W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: early draft XProv v2 requirements/use cases

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEaz5muDXO4dAd5MO-R==0PuVjSsyQ727W5+dWBSNJ7GjHB0xw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
>> I have committed a very rough and early version of Requirements doc.
>>       http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/requirements-v2-jim.xml
>> For todays review.
> I think as a requirement 4.1 should read "Make parameters easier to
> use/understand"; my proposal is a solution not a requiremnt.
> What's the requirement in 4.6? I'm not objecting, I'd just like to
> see it expressed as a requirement.

thx for the suggestion, the plan is to flesh out each area  what we
have at the moment were placeholders for last weeks meeting.

Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:38:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:38:14 GMT