W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: early draft XProv v2 requirements/use cases

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:37:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEaz5muDXO4dAd5MO-R==0PuVjSsyQ727W5+dWBSNJ7GjHB0xw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
>> I have committed a very rough and early version of Requirements doc.
>>
>>       http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/requirements-v2-jim.xml
>>
>> For todays review.
>
> I think as a requirement 4.1 should read "Make parameters easier to
> use/understand"; my proposal is a solution not a requiremnt.
>
> What's the requirement in 4.6? I'm not objecting, I'd just like to
> see it expressed as a requirement.

thx for the suggestion, the plan is to flesh out each area  what we
have at the moment were placeholders for last weeks meeting.

J
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:38:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 18 October 2012 13:38:14 GMT