Re: early draft XProv v2 requirements/use cases

James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:
> I have committed a very rough and early version of Requirements doc.
>
>       http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/requirements-v2-jim.xml
>
> For todays review.

I think as a requirement 4.1 should read "Make parameters easier to
use/understand"; my proposal is a solution not a requiremnt.

What's the requirement in 4.6? I'm not objecting, I'd just like to
see it expressed as a requirement.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 512 761 6676
www.marklogic.com