W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: XProc 1.0 Solutions Note?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 12:47:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJhA6MxfALPOaXwrnK77Xc_AD11rUFzbddNY5Yv3rGbcQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:05 AM, James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> wrote:
> Hello Alex,
>
> Perhaps this was a discussion I missed but it was my understanding that
>
> a) we are creating a new requirements document
>
> b) this document refers back to original requirement v1 document as
> well as a 'report card' of how well those requirements were fulfilled
> by v1.0 (the doc which now contains use cases and examples)

What I am suggesting is we publish a note that details how we have met
v1 requirements and use cases.  Then we can produce a new v2
requirements and use case document that doesn't incorporate the v1
document's content verbatim.  We can then combine, finesse, or
eliminate things for v2 and produce a clear and possibly more compact
document.

-- 
--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language
considered."

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 19:47:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 October 2012 19:47:53 GMT