I have been thinking about our previous requirements document. I think we should refactor our requirements to a new set that make sense going forward. We have a different group of people than where we started. I think we can cover what we accomplished in 1.0 with different wording of requirements without losing their value. One way forward is to publish a simple note that includes the "solutions" that we've already provided for the 1.0 requirements. Then we can reference that in a new requirements document. Meanwhile, we can refactor the 1.0 requirements into a more cohesive set. I personally think that would be easier overall but make some editing work now. -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of MathematicsReceived on Monday, 1 October 2012 15:49:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 October 2012 15:49:49 GMT