W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2012

XProc 1.0 Solutions Note?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 08:49:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CABp3FNJFWPPsyzb+H3cC=U4ufC3r15KeNSGZtsUeYgeQjcUSww@mail.gmail.com>
To: XProc WG <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I have been thinking about our previous requirements document. I think
we should refactor our requirements to a new set that make sense going
forward.  We have a different group of people than where we started.
I think we can cover what we accomplished in 1.0 with different
wording of requirements without losing their value.

One way forward is to publish a simple note that includes the
"solutions" that we've already provided for the 1.0 requirements.
Then we can reference that in a new requirements document.
Meanwhile, we can refactor the 1.0 requirements into a more cohesive

I personally think that would be easier overall but make some editing work now.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 15:49:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:51 UTC