- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:02 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes: >> 1) Why two elements ? Why not just a <p:report> with an optional test attribute > > Oh. Uhm. Yeah, I guess that would work. I vote "concur" on that decision :-) Good ! > >> 2) What is the context of the test : the current sequence of document ? > > Yes. For all expressions evaluated (however we decide to do that) the > context item is the document that is being logged. Heum... that's where it can be tricky. What if we log a sequence of document ? > >> 3) With respect to variable, we already have the p:template behaviour, >> so we could just say that the content of <p:report> is evaluated as if >> it was <p:template> ? > > Ah. Yes. Good thinking, Mohamed! I'm just trying to catch up, Sensei ! Mohamed > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh > Lead Engineer > MarkLogic Corporation > Phone: +1 413 624 6676 > www.marklogic.com -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 12:15:39 UTC