Re: V.next design goals

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> writes:
>> I have certainly and the change I'd like to propose are not so huge
>>
>> On the top of my head, here are two types of modifications :
>>
>> 1) One is to remove the necessity to use p:try/p:catch to capture
>> validation errors (because p:try/p:catch mandates buffering)
>>
>> 2) Another is to allow p:for-each to generate the result of each step
>> in an unordered way (with a simple attribute ordered="true|false", the
>> default being true)
>
> Ok. Those things both seem like low hanging fruit.

+1

J