W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: V.next design goals

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:49:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAK2GfGok5Ed76gJtU+M8+5j2Q9oLrqo8UAcHkeQ6LGANeB4qw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

I would also add, improving relationship with Streaming and Parallel processing

Mohamed

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> What's the point of V.next? Or as Jim put it, what are the guiding
> principles?
>
> 1. Improving ease of use (syntactic improvements)
> 2. Improving ease of use (increasing the scope: non XML content, for example)
> 3. Addressing known shortcomings in the language
>
> Do those look reasonable? Are there others? Are any of those irrelevant?
>
>                    Be seeing you,
>                     norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh
> Lead Engineer
> MarkLogic Corporation
> Phone: +1 413 624 6676
> www.marklogic.com



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:50:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 1 February 2012 15:50:24 GMT