W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > October 2011

[closed] Re: Adding profiles with validation

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:11:35 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2aa95q63c.fsf@nwalsh.com>
At the 13 Oct telcon, we agreed that adding section 7 to the spec resolved this issue.

"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes:
> Further to discussion last month, I've looked at this, and I think in
> fact the right thing to say is, it's orthogonal.  That is, insofar as
> this spec. is focussed on the _information content_ of the data model
> constructed per the various profiles, we already cover the _impact_ of
> validation (it only affects the [element content whitespace] property
> of CIIs) at that level.
>
> On the other hand, I think it would be entirely reasonable to add a
> Note to section 6, Conformance, along these lines
>
>  Note: Validation against a DTD or other schema is almost entirely
>  orthogonal to the data model concerns this specification addresses.
>  It is open to any specification which references this one in a
>  conformance statement to include wording requiring (or indeed
>  forbidding) validation of one or more varieties.
>
> ht
> --
>        Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
>       10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
>                 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                        URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
Phone: +1 413 624 6676
www.marklogic.com

Received on Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:12:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 October 2011 15:12:22 GMT