- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:07:11 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Further to discussion last month, I've looked at this, and I think in
fact the right thing to say is, it's orthogonal. That is, insofar as
this spec. is focussed on the _information content_ of the data model
constructed per the various profiles, we already cover the _impact_ of
validation (it only affects the [element content whitespace] property
of CIIs) at that level.
On the other hand, I think it would be entirely reasonable to add a
Note to section 6, Conformance, along these lines
Note: Validation against a DTD or other schema is almost entirely
orthogonal to the data model concerns this specification addresses.
It is open to any specification which references this one in a
conformance statement to include wording requiring (or indeed
forbidding) validation of one or more varieties.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFOAxBPkjnJixAXWBoRAm5yAJ9eJj3vRanKg3Vnl4EL+DoXO8l57ACeNc/I
KQUzBazLraxsrD7fsjSrJMA=
=Dylh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 10:07:46 UTC