W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2011

Re: p:catch *output* port?

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:53:08 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTim2aGEcX2veA4=Ri1+KjmwpL2xvEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Indeed, I guess Norm was more carefull with "current" on p:for-each or
p:viewport because he speaks about the "current port" (without any extra
precision)

So as a fix, I propose to just delete the "output" word to be consistent
with p:for-each and p:viewport

Mohamed

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:53 AM, <vojtech.toman@emc.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Based on a question posted on xproc-dev (
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xproc-dev/2011Jun/0000.html), I found
> what I think is a error in the spec. If you look at sections 4.6 (p:try) and
> 4.6.1 (The Error Vocabulary), they both refer to the "error" port of p:catch
> as an *output* port. I think that is wrong and it should say *input port*.
>
> Vojtech
>
> --
> Vojtech Toman
> Consultant Software Engineer
> EMC | Information Intelligence Group
> vojtech.toman@emc.com
> http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
>
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 08:53:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 June 2011 08:53:59 GMT