W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Re: XProc Minutes 17 February 2011

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:25:01 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimkptvbi_1DME0GZL7bJ1hs5RVyagF-OruT9XtB@mail.gmail.com>
To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Me too :(

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:07 PM, <vojtech.toman@emc.com> wrote:

> Of course I tried to dial in using the old time. My apologies.
>
> Vojtech
>
>
> --
> Vojtech Toman
> Consultant Software Engineer
> EMC | Information Intelligence Group
> vojtech.toman@emc.com
> http://developer.emc.com/xmltech
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-xml-processing-model-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-
> > processing-model-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:27 PM
> > To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: XProc Minutes 17 February 2011
> >
> > [Fixed Subject:, sorry for the duplication.]
> >
> > See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes
> >
> > [1]W3C
> >
> >                                    - DRAFT -
> >
> >                             XML Processing Model WG
> >
> > Meeting 189, 17 Feb 2011
> >
> >    [2]Agenda
> >
> >    See also: [3]IRC log
> >
> > Attendees
> >
> >    Present
> >            Paul, Norm, Henry, Alex
> >
> >    Regrets
> >
> >    Chair
> >            Norm
> >
> >    Scribe
> >            Norm
> >
> > Contents
> >
> >      * [4]Topics
> >
> >          1. [5]Accept this agenda?
> >          2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
> >          3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 24 Feb 2011?
> >          4. [8]Review of XML processor profiles draft
> >          5. [9]Namespace documents
> >          6. [10]Any other business?
> >
> >      * [11]Summary of Action Items
> >
> >    --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> >   Accept this agenda?
> >
> >    -> [12]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda.html
> >
> >    Accepted.
> >
> >   Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
> >
> >    -> [13]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes.html
> >
> >    Accepted.
> >
> >   Next meeting: telcon, 24 Feb 2011?
> >
> >    Henry gives regrets for 24 Feb; no other regrets heard.
> >
> >   Review of XML processor profiles draft
> >
> >    Norm: Thank you, Henry.
> >
> >    Paul: I like the way it's going, but I'm still not entirely sure
> > what the
> >    different classes, A, A', and B are.
> >
> >    Henry: Yes, I agree. When I started, I thought there'd be one class
> > per
> >    profile, but that's not the way it worked out. I'll add a gloss.
> >
> >    Paul: My other two things were even more editorial.
> >    ... I'm not sure if everyone will understand the distinctions
> > between
> >    information items and properties and the classes.
> >
> >    Henry: I'll think about that. I'm not sure an attempt to clarify
> > would
> >    help.
> >
> >    Paul: Given that we're thinking of releasing a third edition of the
> >    Infoset, I wonder if we should make an edition agnostic reference to
> > the
> >    Infoset.
> >
> >    Norm: Vojtech also had some questions, but he's not here.
> >
> >    Henry: I'll try to get John Cowan or Richard Tobin to look carefully
> > at it
> >    and see if I've got the class annotations correct. Some of these are
> > not
> >    at all obvious.
> >    ... In some cases the choices are a little arbitrary.
> >    ... They could be wrong. I'm going to wait a week and then try to
> > take a
> >    fresh look.
> >    ... The question Vojtech asks is a tricky one. I had forgotten I
> > think
> >    that references isn't just for ID/IDREF.
> >
> >    Alex: Should processing instruction notation just be X? References
> > is more
> >    complicated.
> >
> >    Henry: I really don't like making references implementation
> > dependent.
> >    This just gets a little messier. As it says several times, this
> > table uses
> >    items/properties to identify things in the document. There are
> > multiple
> >    data models.
> >    ... I'm going to leave notations and unparsed entities as X, but
> >    ... I really don't like making references implementation dependent.
> > This
> >    just gets a little messier. As it says several times, this table
> > uses
> >    items/properties to identify things in the document. There are
> > multiple
> >    data models.
> >    ... I'm going to leave notations and unparsed entities as X, but
> >    ... I'm going to change processing instruction notation to X, but
> > I'll
> >    split id/idref references and entities/entities notation references
> > into
> >    two parts.
> >    ... Everybody should report the references property with respect to
> > IDs,
> >    that's not negotiable.
> >    ... Does that sound like it works?
> >
> >    Norm: I think so...
> >    ... So, Henry, you're going to prepare another draft for us?
> >
> >    Henry: Yes. I'm afraid this means another WD though.
> >
> >    Norm: Yes, but that's fine.
> >
> >   Namespace documents
> >
> >    Norm: Mohamed pointed out a few more oversights, anyone else see any
> >    problems?
> >
> >    Nobody says so.
> >
> >    Norm: Ok, I'll fix the problems Mohamed pointed out and try again.
> >
> >   Any other business?
> >
> >    Alex: Do we have an XProc meeting planned at XML Prague?
> >
> >    Henry: I've agreed to do a 10 minute slot about processor profiles.
> >
> >    Alex: It would be nice to get some feedback.
> >
> >    Adjourned.
> >
> > Summary of Action Items
> >
> >    [End of minutes]
> >
> >    --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> >
> >     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.135
> > ([15]CVS
> >     log)
> >     $Date: 2011/02/17 15:25:55 $
> >
> > References
> >
> >    1. http://www.w3.org/
> >    2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda
> >    3. http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-xproc-irc
> >    4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#agenda
> >    5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item01
> >    6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item02
> >    7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item03
> >    8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item04
> >    9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item05
> >   10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#item06
> >   11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-minutes#ActionSummary
> >   12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/17-agenda.html
> >   13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2011/02/03-minutes.html
> >   14. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
> >   15. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Thursday, 17 February 2011 16:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 February 2011 16:25:36 GMT