W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: new draft xml proc profiles doc

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:41:33 +0000
To: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Cc: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bvcpi6m82.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com> writes:

>> I had in mind to just put them at the beginning of section 2, just
>> before section 2.1, perhaps in the following form:
> as previous email, I think we reduce usefulness by moving the text
> away from the profiles formal description. Perhaps there is some
> benefit in obfuscating in one place and making a simple overview area
> in another, but I'm not overly convinced. Practically I think it justs
> forces readers to bunny hop around the document.
>>  The four profiles defined here identify four increasingly rich
>>  profiles, in terms of kinds of processing and amount of information
>>  provided to applications:
> I would put this in section 2.0 ;)

That's what I thought I suggested :-)

> I like how you massaged the descriptions …. shall I flow them in now
> and we can debate the merits of location at todays telcon ?

I'd rather you didn't, if you mean just change then in 2.1 -- 2.4, as
I wrote them to be read as a unit.

We can discuss on the call based on the email, I think. . .

       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:42:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:50 UTC