W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > December 2011

Re: new draft xml proc profiles doc

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:31:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mvZB=HqXeayRpBGthmxaGfm9jwDSr1KKJcZAeWytGcEnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: vojtech.toman@emc.com
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Hello Vojtech,

I have made the following changes;

DONE (renamed to lowercase) 1. Section 2.3 contains "_C_lass Extended"
while everywhere else the text uses "class" with lowercase "c".

DONE (corrected) 4. Typo in section 6: existance -> existence

DONE (removed 'about') 5. Typo in section 7: "not all of the profiles
defined about can be combined" about -> above? (But maybe I just don't
know the phrase.)

DONE (corrected link references) 6. URLs in the References section:
The link to the latest version of the XProc specification is still
wrong: http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xproc-20100309/. It should be:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xproc-20100511/
Well, it is actually more complicated: look at the URL under *xml:id*.

and have left for us to discuss this afternoon.

FOR DISCUSSION 2. Regarding the perennial problems with "Entirely,
..." in sections
4.2.2/4.2.3: what about changing it to something like "Differs
entirely, ..."?
With the current text, I think it is quite difficult to see what
"Entirely" actually refers to.

FOR DISCUSSION 3. Section 4.2.2: The text now uses the phrase:
"Entirely, in a way
parallel to the Element Information Items case above."
I think we know what "parallel" means in this context, but isn't it
still too vague?
 Is using the analogy with the EII case really better than including
the precise full text for each information item? The same applies to
section 4.2.3.

I hope that is satisfactory,

Jim Fuller
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 10:54:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 15 December 2011 10:54:46 GMT