W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Browsers and profiles

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:36:34 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=dO_YMvZxTg14vhvH9M16m4s9cjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org> writes:
>> efficiently.  At the same time you've just turned off external subsets
>> for all XML documents.
> Right. And I assert that they will not fix that. Period. Henri's
> decision to close WONTFIX your bug on this issue is the clinching
> proof, I believe.

I'm not sure which bug you are referring to but I haven't any open
that have been closed as WONTFIX.

>> Similarly, xml:id process becomes a pain in languages like XHTML where
>> you already have an ID type attribute (i.e. "id") but that becomes
>> solvable even if the processing is a bit hairy.
> Maybe we should drop that from the recommended profile as well, then.

I don't think that is necessary.

>> I don't think of this as inflammatory but I do think there is still a
>> problem.  I think we still want XIncude in the "recommended profile
>> for browsers".  We don't have a profile that turns off external
>> subsets and includes XInclude processing.
> Yes. I'm throwing the XInclude baby out with the external subset bath
> water. I don't think the browsers are going to implement XInclude
> either. They're allergic to "X" words, it's never going to be part of
> HTML, and it's a little tricky to get all the fallback stuff right.

I think this is being overly pessimistic.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 13:37:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:49 UTC