W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Re: How is an XProc processor defined?

From: Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:10:58 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTin2Dfq2tw8xtAMhJMt6psnL8UbcP6u-h-VR1i8_@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:05 AM,  <vojtech.toman@emc.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I cannot find a definition of an XProc processor anywhere in the XProc
> specification. Shouldn't we have one?

I think you're right.  It looks like we didn't define one.

Can we add a definition in an errata ?  We use the term "XProc
processor" and also just "processor" when we mean "XProc processor"
all over the specification.

--Alex Milowski
"The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the
inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language

Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 11:11:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:48 UTC