W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > November 2010

RE: First draft of template note

From: <vojtech.toman@emc.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 02:43:16 -0500
Message-ID: <997C307BEB90984EBE935699389EC41C02A748BD@CORPUSMX70C.corp.emc.com>
To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> > No, I don't think we could. I think that the primary nature of a
> > parameter input port is independent of the primary nature of a
> > input port.
> >
> The parameters port is a kind of input port.  I don't see why we can't
do this.

I think Alex meant making "parameters" a primary *non-parameter* input
port. That would work, but it would also be, IMHO, a real twisting of
conventions used in the spec...

Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 07:44:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:48 UTC