W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2010

Re: 'Default processing model' or 'basic XML processor profile'?

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:25:45 +0100
To: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
Cc: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <f5bfx1d2r52.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

[anon] writes:

> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed the following in section 3 of the XML processing profiles
> spec:
>
> "
> The following [XProc: An XML Pipeline Language] pipeline, when
> implemented by a conformant processor which processes its input as
> required by point (1) above, implements the ***default process***:
>
> Example: XProc pipeline which implements the ***default processing
> model***
> "
>
> Instead of "default process" and "default processing model", shouldn't
> it say "basic XML processor profile"?

Yes, thanks.  /me rules this Editorial and will just fix.

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFL/qsZkjnJixAXWBoRAqEeAJ45xO3qQeIYF9AD4n75vwdYvvx8wACcDCoc
/qbzOUsZ9MN2M22Q4DtM+Hc=
=5FcM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2010 17:26:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 May 2010 17:26:22 GMT