W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2010

XProc Minutes 21 January 2010

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:29:09 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m28wbnnt62.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes

[1]W3C

                                   - DRAFT -

                            XML Processing Model WG

Meeting 164, 21 Jan 2010

   [2]Agenda

   See also: [3]IRC log

Attendees

   Present
           Norm, Paul, Vojtech, Alex

   Regrets

   Chair
           Norm

   Scribe
           Norm

Contents

     * [4]Topics

         1. [5]Accept this agenda?
         2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meetings?
         3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 28 Jan 2010?
         4. [8]Status of rechartering
         5. [9]Comments on the current draft?
         6. [10]009 p:string-replace/@context
         7. [11]008 typo in example
         8. [12]Test suite progress
         9. [13]Default processing model
        10. [14]Any other business?

     * [15]Summary of Action Items

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Accept this agenda?

   -> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda

   Accepted.

  Accept minutes from the previous meetings?

   -> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/07-minutes

   -> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/14-minutes

   Accepted.

   Norm will do his actions post haste.

  Next meeting: telcon, 28 Jan 2010?

   Vojtech gives regrets; Norm gives regrets for 4 Feb, will decide whether
   or not to meet on 4 Feb at the 28 Jan call

  Status of rechartering

   Norm: I believe it was approved by W3M, we'll wait for Henry to confirm.

  Comments on the current draft?

   -> [19]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/

  009 p:string-replace/@context

   Vojtech: I think we need to make the context explicit.

   Norm: Yes, I think that's an oversight

   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to clarify p:string-replace wrt the context node for
   evaluating the replace example [recorded in
   [20]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action01]

  008 typo in example

   Vojtech: That's just a typo, you can't refer to $foo

   Norm: Right. My bad.

   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to correct the typo in the p:string-replace example
   wrt $foo in @replace [recorded in
   [21]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action02]

   Norm: I'll attempt to correct these errors and bring the draft and issues
   list up to date before the next meeting.

  Test suite progress

   Norm: Thanks for all the new tests, Vojtech!

   Vojtech: I added a couple of tests that are meant to test multipart
   response handling, but we need a server-side response first.

   Norm: Right, I'll update the server side.

   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to update tests.xproc.org so that there's a
   server-side script that returns a multipart message [recorded in
   [22]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action03]

   Vojtech: The example that I saw often includes a MIME-version header. Is
   that something that is required or recommended?

   Norm: I don't think it's required...

   Vojtech: Is there another version of MIME?

   Norm: No clue. Alex?

   Alex: According to Wikipedia, the version is always "1.0"

   Norm: Do you have a sense of the coverage?

   Vojtech: The last area that I thought was missing was the multipart
   suppport. But I think we're getting there.

   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to regenerate the coverage report [recorded in
   [23]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action04]

   Vojtech: There are still two contradictory XML Schema tests.
   ... I don't remember which tests, but it has to do with default values for
   hints.

   <scribe> ACTION: Norm to put the conflicting schema tests on the agenda
   for next week when Henry will be present [recorded in
   [24]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action05]

  Default processing model

   Norm: Can't really make progress without Henry, defer to next week.

  Any other business?

   Norm: Who's going to XML Prague?
   ... I think Mohamed and I are going, anyone else?

   Vojtech: I'm not sure.

   Alex: I might be in Europe in March, so maybe.

   Adjourned.

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: Norm to clarify p:string-replace wrt the context node for
   evaluating the replace example [recorded in
   [25]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action01]
   [NEW] ACTION: Norm to correct the typo in the p:string-replace example wrt
   $foo in @replace [recorded in
   [26]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action02]
   [NEW] ACTION: Norm to put the conflicting schema tests on the agenda for
   next week when Henry will be present [recorded in
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action05]
   [NEW] ACTION: Norm to regenerate the coverage report [recorded in
   [28]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action04]
   [NEW] ACTION: Norm to update tests.xproc.org so that there's a server-side
   script that returns a multipart message [recorded in
   [29]http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action03]

   [End of minutes]

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([31]CVS
    log)
    $Date: 2010/01/24 20:27:56 $

References

   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda
   3. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item01
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item02
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item03
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item04
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item06
  11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item07
  12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item08
  13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item09
  14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#item10
  15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes#ActionSummary
  16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda
  17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/07-minutes
  18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/01/14-minutes
  19. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/
  20. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action01
  21. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action02
  22. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action03
  23. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action04
  24. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action05
  25. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action01
  26. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action02
  27. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action05
  28. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action04
  29. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/21-xproc-minutes.html#action03
  30. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  31. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 20:29:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 24 January 2010 20:29:44 GMT