W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > January 2010

XProc Minutes 14 January 2010

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:30:21 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2d414gaz6.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes

[1]W3C

                                   - DRAFT -

                                  XProc telcon

14 Jan 2010

   [2]Agenda

   See also: [3]IRC log

Attendees

   Present
           Henry, Paul, Mohamed, Vojetch, Alex

   Regrets
           Norm

   Chair
           Henry S. Thompson (pro tem)

   Scribe
           Henry S. Thompson

Contents

     * [4]Topics

         1. [5]Charter
         2. [6]HTTP multipart
         3. [7]namespace and prefix attrs -- missing error
         4. [8]Test Suite
         5. [9]Default processing model

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

   [10]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-agenda.html

   Next meeting: 21 Jan.

   Regrets for 21 Jan: Henry, Mohamed

   Regrets for 28 Jan: Voytech

  Charter

   It runs out at the end of this month

   RESOLUTION: Request a charter extension, recharter later

   How long an extension?

   RESOLUTION: Request an 8 month extension, to allow for the summer

  HTTP multipart

   Consensus by email that content model of multipart is just body+

   And that the prose about headers inside multipart has to go as well

   Then we have Voytech's message
   [11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2010Jan/0008.html

   VT: The default for content-type on multipart might conflict -- should
   this be an error, or should we make it required?

   AM: or should we instead specify that the default is to inherit?

   VT: content-type is required on c:body

   AM: Doing the inheritance will not make it easier to understand
   ... we should just make it required, and assume that people will mostly
   not use c:header Content-Type with c:multipart
   ... So, two alternatives: leave as is but make clear inconsistency is an
   error; make required

   VT: Any pblm with making it required?
   ... If you are building it dynamically, you might have to find it in a
   header. . .

   AM: Same even w/o multipart
   ... Given the long list of possible types, it's hard to be sure what the
   right default is, so making it required avoids having to pick

   RESOLUTION: make the content-type attribute required on c:multipart

  namespace and prefix attrs -- missing error

   [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2010Jan/0012.html

   TV: What happens if you specify wrapper-prefix or wrapper-namespace but no
   wrapper, on p:data?

   HT: Because the implicit default is c:data, that's an error (the same
   error as an explicit wrapper with a : in)

   RESOLUTION: Make clear that if if you specify wrapper-prefix or
   wrapper-namespace but no wrapper, on p:data, that's an error (the same
   error as an explicit wrapper with a : in)

  Test Suite

   TV: 50 new tests, prefix, namespace, http-request

   HT: WooHoo -- gold star

  Default processing model

   PG: What's next on this?

   HST: We have comments from the TAG, which I need to summarise and present
   to this group
   ... Then we decide what change, if any, to make, and whether to publish a
   First PWD.

Summary of Action Items

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [13]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([14]CVS
    log)
    $Date: 2010/01/20 13:24:06 $

References

   Visible links
   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-agenda.html
   3. http://www.w3.org/2010/01/14-xproc-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#item01
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#item02
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#item03
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#item04
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-minutes#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/14-agenda.html
  11. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2010Jan/0008.html
  12. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-comments/2010Jan/0012.html
  13. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  14. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2010 13:30:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 20 January 2010 13:30:55 GMT