- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:38:25 -0500
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <m2y6ihl18e.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes
[1]W3C
- DRAFT -
XML Processing Model WG
Meeting 169, 25 Feb 2010
[2]Agenda
See also: [3]IRC log
Attendees
Present
Paul, Norm, Vojtech, Mohamed, Alex
Regrets
Chair
Norm
Scribe
Norm
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Accept this agenda?
2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 04 Mar 2010?
4. [8]xslt step with text output
5. [9]Test suite: variable-005
6. [10]Test suite: err-s0004-005
7. [11]try-namespaces
8. [12]Namespace hint
9. [13]Progress towards PR
10. [14]Any other business
* [15]Summary of Action Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accept this agenda?
-> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
Accepted.
Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
-> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes
Accepted.
Next meeting: telcon, 04 Mar 2010?
No regrets heard.
xslt step with text output
-> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021
Norm: I propose we close this without action.
Accepted.
Test suite: variable-005
-> [19]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023
Vojtech: We now require a binding in p:xpath-context, so what does the
sentence in 4.4 mean.
... it says you need a default readable port.
Norm: Yes, I think an editorial change here makes sense, to explicitly
note that the default readable port can be undefined
Proposal: Leave the status quo, with the editorial fix mentioned above.
Accepted.
Test suite: err-s0004-005
-> [20]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024
Norm describes the issue.
Norm: I don't feel strongly about it.
Vojtech: We do a similar thing with parameter input port.
Norm: I concede that this a little inconsistent.
Proposal: Allow required='false' when select is used on p:option
Vojtech: This change will also simplify tools that build pipelines.
Accepted.
try-namespaces
-> [21]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026
Vojtech: In 2008, we decided to add "try-namespace"
Norm: Ok, it was editorial sloppiness then
Proposal: Fix the bug, change to try-namespace.
Accepted.
Namespace hint
-> [22]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027
Norm: What if the document element is in no namespace.
Vojtech: Just ignore the hint.
Norm: I agree.
Proposal: Ignore the hint.
Accepted.
Norm: And if there isn't a document there, that's ok too.
General agreement
Progress towards PR
-> [23]http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
-> [24]http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html
Norm: We're done!
Henry: Woo hoo!
<alexmilowski> Yippie!
Norm: I assert that we have a complete [25]test suite and [26]two
implementations of every relevant feature.
Paul: Congratulations.
Norm: I propose that we request transition to PR
Accepted.
Norm: Henry, what are the next steps?
Henry: You put together a transition request, I review it, and you send
it.
Paul: If you look at the draft transition request that I sent out for
XLink 1.1, that should help.
<ht>
[27]http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl
Any other business
None heard.
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [28]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([29]CVS
log)
$Date: 2010/02/25 16:37:31 $
References
1. http://www.w3.org/
2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
3. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-xproc-irc
4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#agenda
5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item01
6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item02
7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item03
8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item04
9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item05
10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item06
11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item07
12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item08
13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item09
14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item10
15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#ActionSummary
16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes
18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021
19. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023
20. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024
21. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026
22. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027
23. http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
24. http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html
25. http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/
26. http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
27. http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl
28. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
29. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:39:03 UTC