W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2010

XProc Minutes 25 February 2010

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:38:25 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2y6ihl18e.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes

[1]W3C

                                   - DRAFT -

                            XML Processing Model WG

Meeting 169, 25 Feb 2010

   [2]Agenda

   See also: [3]IRC log

Attendees

   Present
           Paul, Norm, Vojtech, Mohamed, Alex

   Regrets

   Chair
           Norm

   Scribe
           Norm

Contents

     * [4]Topics

         1. [5]Accept this agenda?
         2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
         3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 04 Mar 2010?
         4. [8]xslt step with text output
         5. [9]Test suite: variable-005
         6. [10]Test suite: err-s0004-005
         7. [11]try-namespaces
         8. [12]Namespace hint
         9. [13]Progress towards PR
        10. [14]Any other business

     * [15]Summary of Action Items

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Accept this agenda?

   -> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda

   Accepted.

  Accept minutes from the previous meeting?

   -> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes

   Accepted.

  Next meeting: telcon, 04 Mar 2010?

   No regrets heard.

  xslt step with text output

   -> [18]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021

   Norm: I propose we close this without action.

   Accepted.

  Test suite: variable-005

   -> [19]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023

   Vojtech: We now require a binding in p:xpath-context, so what does the
   sentence in 4.4 mean.
   ... it says you need a default readable port.

   Norm: Yes, I think an editorial change here makes sense, to explicitly
   note that the default readable port can be undefined

   Proposal: Leave the status quo, with the editorial fix mentioned above.

   Accepted.

  Test suite: err-s0004-005

   -> [20]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024

   Norm describes the issue.

   Norm: I don't feel strongly about it.

   Vojtech: We do a similar thing with parameter input port.

   Norm: I concede that this a little inconsistent.

   Proposal: Allow required='false' when select is used on p:option

   Vojtech: This change will also simplify tools that build pipelines.

   Accepted.

  try-namespaces

   -> [21]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026

   Vojtech: In 2008, we decided to add "try-namespace"

   Norm: Ok, it was editorial sloppiness then

   Proposal: Fix the bug, change to try-namespace.

   Accepted.

  Namespace hint

   -> [22]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027

   Norm: What if the document element is in no namespace.

   Vojtech: Just ignore the hint.

   Norm: I agree.

   Proposal: Ignore the hint.

   Accepted.

   Norm: And if there isn't a document there, that's ok too.

   General agreement

  Progress towards PR

   -> [23]http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html

   -> [24]http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html

   Norm: We're done!

   Henry: Woo hoo!

   <alexmilowski> Yippie!

   Norm: I assert that we have a complete [25]test suite and [26]two
   implementations of every relevant feature.

   Paul: Congratulations.

   Norm: I propose that we request transition to PR

   Accepted.

   Norm: Henry, what are the next steps?

   Henry: You put together a transition request, I review it, and you send
   it.

   Paul: If you look at the draft transition request that I sent out for
   XLink 1.1, that should help.

   <ht>
   [27]http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl

  Any other business

   None heard.

Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]

   --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [28]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([29]CVS
    log)
    $Date: 2010/02/25 16:37:31 $

References

   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
   3. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/25-xproc-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item01
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item02
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item03
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item04
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item06
  11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item07
  12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item08
  13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item09
  14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#item10
  15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-minutes#ActionSummary
  16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/25-agenda
  17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/18-minutes
  18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C021
  19. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C023
  20. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C024
  21. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C026
  22. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/lc-comments/#C027
  23. http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
  24. http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html
  25. http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/
  26. http://tests.xproc.org/results/comparison.html
  27. http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xmlfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/01-transitions.html&xslfile=http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transitions.xsl
  28. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  29. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:39:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 25 February 2010 16:39:03 GMT