W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > February 2010

XProc Minutes 11 Feb 2010

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:48:50 -0500
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m28wazbtvx.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes


                                   - DRAFT -

                            XML Processing Model WG

Meeting 167, 11 Feb 2010


   See also: [3]IRC log


           Norm, Alex, Mohamed, Vojtech, Henry





     * [4]Topics

         1. [5]Accept this agenda?
         2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
         3. [7]Next meeting: telcon, 18 Feb 2010
         4. [8]LC003: XSLT match pattern
         5. [9]010 Scoping of options and variables
         6. [10]013: multiple inputs in test expression
         7. [11]016: pipelines with infinite recursion
         8. [12]Change the type of prefix value to NCName
         9. [13]More string changes
        10. [14]Any other business?

     * [15]Summary of Action Items


  Accept this agenda?

   -> [16]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-agenda


  Accept minutes from the previous meeting?

   -> [17]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes


  Next meeting: telcon, 18 Feb 2010

   Mohamed gives regrets for 18 Feb

  LC003: XSLT match pattern

   Vojtech: We discussed this.

   Norm: Ok, I'll dig back further to see what I can find.

   <MoZ> Norm, w.r.t pattern see

   <Vojtech> XSLT match pattern discussion:

  010 Scoping of options and variables

   Norm: I didn't understand, I guess.

   Henry: Take option and variable names together and make them the same as
   step names.
   ... There's no lexical shadowing, only dynamic shadowing.

   Norm: Ok.

  013: multiple inputs in test expression

   Norm discusses his thoughts about inputs and collection()

   Vojtech: I think we need to make it well defined behavior, or leave it as
   it is

   Alex: Is collection() in XPath 2.

   Norm: yes.

   Vojtech: What I would see as the right solution would be to allow multiple
   documents appearing in the XPath context and we say we take the first one
   as the context item. But you can use collection() to get to the others.

   Norm: I think this has gone as far as it needs to.

   Alex: The status quo is implementation defined.

   Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo, do nothing.


  016: pipelines with infinite recursion

   Vojtech: I was just wondering, but Norm replied.

   Norm: I think we say enough.
   ... Proposal: leave the status quo.


   Norm: Test suite progress
   ... Has the schema test resolution quesiton been resolved?

   Vojtech: It's valid-xsd-004 and 011. They're the same and one is expected
   to succeed and one is expected to fail.
   ... One relies on the default value for use-location-hints and the other
   sets it to false, which is the default.

   Norm: Do we have another test that explicitly sets it to true?
   ... Yes, 008.
   ... I think we should change 004 so that it's expected to fail, just like

   Vojtech: Do we want to change the default on validate-with-xmlschema?

   Norm: Henry, what does the world expect?

   Henry: For XSV, they're true and true, respectively. For Saxon, I think
   it's true and false, respectively.
   ... No, the default is false. That's probably why we did it the way we

   Norm: Proposal: leave the status quo and change the test.


  Change the type of prefix value to NCName

   Norm: Mohamed observes that we have options that are expected to contain
   prefixes that are of type string. He suggests we change their types to
   ... I have no objection.

   Henry: I don't think that's a breaking change.

   Proposal: Accept this change?


  More string changes

   Mohamed: There are at least two issues in p:label-elements

   Some discussion of the questions. Type of label changed to

  Any other business?

   None heard.


Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [20]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([21]CVS
    $Date: 2010/02/11 16:48:04 $


   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-agenda
   3. http://www.w3.org/2010/02/11-xproc-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item01
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item02
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item03
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item04
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item06
  11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item07
  12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item08
  13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item09
  14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#item10
  15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-minutes#ActionSummary
  16. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/02/11-agenda
  17. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/21-minutes
  18. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2010/01/07-minutes
  19. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2010Jan/0007.html
  20. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  21. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 16:49:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:48 UTC