- From: <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 03:10:07 -0400
- To: <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
> "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> writes: > > > I realise that part of the reason for wanting this step is a sort of > > atavistic desire to "avoid launching" XSLT or XQuery. . . > > FWIW, in my implementation at least, launching XSLT or XQuery is > reasonably close to free... > > Be seeing you, > norm Lucky you :) But I think there is still value in having this step/feature, for instance for "minimalistic" or "light-weight" implementations that support neither XSLT or XQuery. Plus the template step will most likely be more streamable than XSLT or XQuery Vojtech
Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 07:11:11 UTC