W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Posting multipart/form-data

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:11:36 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30212F81A5F@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <liam@w3.org>, "Alex Milowski" <alex@milowski.org>, <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
I nominate the U of Edinburgh AC rep.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 April 13 5:28
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: liam@w3.org; Alex Milowski; public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Posting multipart/form-data
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > I don't think it matters from where the comment comes.
> >
> > The PR review ends this Thursday.  If someone (even on
> > the WG) comments that they support the PR only if we
> > add the missing attribute that we had already decided
> > to add, I would think there should be no problem adding
> > that between PR and Rec, especially if there were a test
> > case with this attribute that 2 implementations passed.
> 
> Agreed.  Who will bell the cat? (One of us can do it, you can revise a
> response already submitted).
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:12:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:12:10 GMT