W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Technically complete editor's draft

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:19:52 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0905110919w412ac0caq6274668038570876@mail.gmail.com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Just a small presentational problem

[[

   1.

      Changed p:exec. Added arg-separator, path-separator, and
failure-threshold. Input can be zero or one document only. Added
support for a result code. Changed p:choose and p:try. An output port
produces a sequence if that port produces a sequence in any
subpipeline. Added primary output port result to p:error. Clarified
p:validate-with-xml-schema with respect to assert-valid=false and
schema imports and includes. Clarified p:http-request in many ways.
]]

It should either be not a numbered list like

[[
      Changed p:exec. Added arg-separator, path-separator, and
failure-threshold. Input can be zero or one document only. Added
support for a result code. Changed p:choose and p:try. An output port
produces a sequence if that port produces a sequence in any
subpipeline. Added primary output port result to p:error. Clarified
p:validate-with-xml-schema with respect to assert-valid=false and
schema imports and includes. Clarified p:http-request in many ways.
]]
or a more expanded list like
[[

   1.      Changed p:exec. Added arg-separator, path-separator, and
failure-threshold. Input can be zero or one document only. Added
support for a result code.
   2.      Changed p:choose and p:try. An output port produces a
sequence if that port produces a sequence in any subpipeline.
   3.      Added primary output port result to p:error.
   4.      Clarified p:validate-with-xml-schema with respect to
assert-valid=false and schema imports and includes.
   5.      Clarified p:http-request in many ways.
]]

Regards

Mohamed



On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
> Oops. I accidentally sent this to the comments list. Well, I guess
> that's OK too.
>
> I believe the current editor's draft at
>
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/langspec.html
>
> is technically complete. If you think I've overlooked the resolution
> of an issue, please let me know. I'm going to update the status
> section, skim it for editorial issues, and call it "good to go",
> absent any review comments.
>
> I've updated the diff,
>
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/diff.html
>
> against the current public CR draft. I'm pleased to see that it's
> quite a managable diff.
>
>                    Be seeing you,
>                     norm
>
> --
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | During the first period of a man's life
> http://nwalsh.com/      | the greatest danger is: not to take the
>               | risk.-- Kierkegaard
>



-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 16:20:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 11 May 2009 16:20:33 GMT