W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org > June 2009

XProc Minutes 11 June 2009

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:34:10 -0400
To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <m2zlc664el.fsf@nwalsh.com>
See http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes


                                   - DRAFT -

                            XML Processing Model WG

Meeting 146, 11 Jun 2009


   See also: [3]IRC log


           Norm, Alex, Vojtech, Mohamed, Paul





     * [4]Topics

         1. [5]Accept this agenda?
         2. [6]Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
         3. [7]Next meeting: telcon 18 June 2009
         4. [8]Comments on the CR draft
         5. [9]Test suite coverage?
         6. [10]Implementation coverage?
         7. [11]Default XML Processing Model
         8. [12]Any other business?

     * [13]Summary of Action Items


  Accept this agenda?

   -> [14]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-agenda


  Accept minutes from the previous meeting?

   -> [15]http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/05/27-minutes


  Next meeting: telcon 18 June 2009

   No regrets given

  Comments on the CR draft

   Norm: I'll get a new version out RSN with the new function we added.
   ... I saw a few editorial issues on the lists, I'll try to fix those too.
   ... I know we've all read the spec 100 times, but it would be nice to read
   it through one more time.

   <scribe> ACTION: Mohamed volunteers to read the CR draft again [recorded
   in [16]http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-xproc-minutes.html#action01]

  Test suite coverage?

   Norm: I don't have an official report, but it's definitely less than 100%
   ... Does anyone have any ideas on how we might improve that?

   -> [17]http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html

   Norm: Missing: escape-markup (serialization in general)

   Vojtech: We also need to test p:store, probably the same way

   Norm: That really can't be tested in the current test harness, it'll need
   to be done by comparing files on disk, I think.
   ... Really, if you overlook the serialization options, we're not in bad

   Mohamed: It's hard to test serialization in all cases, consider p:exec

   Norm: True, but if we get good results for, say p:store, I'm willing to
   argue that impls are likely to get it right in the other cases.

  Implementation coverage?

   Norm: I think Vojtech and I are both striving for 100% coverage.
   ... That's the bare minimum needed to declare victory.

   Mohamed: I've heard of another one in google code.

   Some discussion of doing XProc using GWT to get it into the browser.

   Norm: Anything else to be said about implementation coverage?

   None heard

  Default XML Processing Model

   Norm: In Henry's absence, I'm inclined to leave this until next week, but
   does anyone have anything they'd like to discuss?

   None heard

   Norm: Let's postpone this until Henry is present

  Any other business?

   None heard.


Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: Mohamed volunteers to read the CR draft again [recorded in

   [End of minutes]


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [19]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([20]CVS
    $Date: 2009/06/17 19:29:42 $


   Visible links
   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-agenda
   3. http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-xproc-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item01
   6. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item02
   7. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item03
   8. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item04
   9. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item06
  11. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item07
  12. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#item08
  13. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-minutes#ActionSummary
  14. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/06/11-agenda
  15. http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2009/05/27-minutes
  16. http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-xproc-minutes.html#action01
  17. http://tests.xproc.org/testsuite/coverage.html
  18. http://www.w3.org/2009/06/11-xproc-minutes.html#action01
  19. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  20. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2009 19:34:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:32:47 UTC