Re: Version attribute issues

"Toman_Vojtech@emc.com" <Toman_Vojtech@emc.com> writes:

>> Actually, on closer inspection, I wonder if the intent of 
>> 2.13 was to say
>> that XProc version applies to p:pipeline, p:declare-step, or
> p:library
>> and no where else.
>
> I think that was the intent. In my view, the same XProc version falls
> in
> the same category as xpath-version and psvi-required. The same
> inheritance rules apply.

Good. That makes sense to me.

> Perhaps it wouldn't be that much work to support @version at the step
> "invocation" level in V1, but given that a (more verbose) workaround
> always exists, it would be more of a convenience feature. So my
> opinion:
> not in V1.

Perfect!

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The effects of weakness are
http://nwalsh.com/            | inconceivable, and more prodigious than
                              | those of the most violent
                              | passions.--Cardinal De Retz